WIKILEAKS: HILLARY WANTED INDIANS SPIED OVER UNSC BID

Washington November 29:

            Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described India as a “self-appointed front-runner” for a permanent UNSC seat and directed U.S. envoys to seek minute details about Indian diplomats stationed at the United Nations headquarters, according to classified documents released by WikiLeaks on Monday.

In a potentially damaging disclosure, the whistle-blower Website released a cable labelled “secret” issued by Ms. Clinton on July 31, 2009, as part of its massive leak of a quarter million classified documents of the American government. The cable gave directions to U.S. diplomats to collect information on key issues like reform of the U.N. Security Council and India-U.S. civilian nuclear deal and pass it on to the intelligence agencies, including on foreign associates’ credit card and frequent-flier numbers that could be used to track a person’s movements.

It asked the U.S. diplomats to ascertain deliberations regarding the UNSC expansion among key groups of countries like “self-appointed front-runners” for permanent UNSC seats — India, Brazil, Germany and Japan (Group of Four or G-4); Uniting for Consensus group — especially Mexico, Italy and Pakistan — that opposes additional permanent UNSC seats; African Group; and European Union, as well as key U.N. officials within the Secretariat and the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) Presidency.

It also sought biographical and biometric information on key NAM/G-77/OIC (Organisation of Islamic Countries) permanent representatives, particularly China, Cuba, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, South Africa, Sudan, Uganda, Senegal and Syria; and information on their relationships with their capitals. The cable also wanted to know about members’ plans for plenary meetings of the Nuclear Suppliers Group; views on the U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation initiative; besides members’ views on the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT); prospects for country ratifications and entry into force.

Quoting from the cable, The New York Times said, it gave a laundry list of instructions for how the State Department employees can fulfil the demands of a “National Humint Collection Directive” in specific countries. Humint being the spy-world jargon for human intelligence collection. One cable asks officers overseas to gather information about “office and organisational titles; names, position titles and other information on business cards; numbers of telephones, cellphones, pagers and faxes,” as well as “internet and intranet handles, internet e-mail addresses, web site identification-URLs; credit card account numbers; frequent-flier account numbers; work schedules, and other relevant biographical information,” it said.

Among the secret U.S. documents released by WikiLeaks, a total of 3,038 classified cables are from the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi. A breakdown indicates that as many as 2,278 cables are from the U.S. mission in Kathmandu, 3,325 from Colombo and 2,220 from Islamabad. These cables are often candid and some time personal assessment of the day to day events, functioning and meetings of U.S. diplomats. The documents are being published by several media outlets across the globe, despite repeated insistence from the U.S. that it may put at risk many lives and harm American ties with its friends.

The 251,287 cables, first acquired by WikiLeaks, were provided to The New York Times by an intermediary on the condition of anonymity, the daily said. Many are unclassified, and none are marked “top secret,” the government’s most secure communications status. But some 11,000 are classified “secret,” 9,000 are labelled “noforn,” shorthand for material considered too delicate to be shared with any foreign government, and 4,000 are designated both secret and noforn.

Ahead of the leak of the documents, the State Department had reached out to India warning it about the impending release. “We have reached out to India to warn them about a possible release of documents,” State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley had said. The U.S. has termed the leak as illegal and said that this would affect its relationship with its friends and allies. “These cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only U.S. foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement.